Another NoSQL Comparison: Evaluation Guide

Another NoSQL Comparison: Evaluation Guide: "Another NoSQL Comparison: Evaluation Guide:
The requirements were clear:

• Fast data insertion.
• Extremely fast random reads on large datasets.
• Consistent read/write speed across the whole data set.
• Efficient data storage.
• Scale well.
• Easy to maintain.
• Have a network interface.
• Stable, of course.

The list of NoSQL databases to be compared: Tokyo Cabinet, BerkleyDB, MemcacheDB, Project Voldemort, Redis, and MongoDB, not so clear.

The methodology to evaluate and the results definitely not clear at all.

And the conclusion is quite wrong:

Although MongoDB is the solution for most NoSQL use cases, it’s not the only solution for all NoSQL needs.

Original title and link: Another NoSQL Comparison: Evaluation Guide (NoSQL databases © myNoSQL)

"